Submissions offline for a couple of hours due to high load

Página 1 de 121 2 3 ...12 Siguiente

- RNR escribió...
- Personal de Last.fm
- 30 Nov 2004, 15:14
Submissions offline for a couple of hours due to high load

503 wait and see. no more of that, had to switch subs off for a while, will be back when we have determined what is what. hang in there folks.

UPDATE: no more submissions until tomorrow morning. for an unknown reason load is extreme only switching subs off helps us out of misery, or the website is offline. RJ and Russ are in the pub with Rob from Musicbrainz, so until tomorrow morning we can do nothing to improve the situation. sit tight.

UPDATE (Russ): PHP is being annoying yet again. Submissions are down until further notice. Sorry.

UPDATE (Russ - 2004-12-01 16:00 GMT): We're rewriting submissions in Java - it's going to be at least another 24 hours before we're up and running again, probably longer.

UPDATE (RJ - 3rd Dec): Running the php system whilst we finish the java rewrite. It's eating far more CPU that it should but we can get by until the java version is ready to deploy.

Both kinds of music: Rock & Roll - SFTRI

[quote][b][user]RNR[/user][/b] escribió: 503 wait and see. no more of that, had to switch subs off for a while, will be back when we have determined what is what. hang in there folks. [b]UPDATE:[/b] no more submissions until tomorrow morning. for an unknown reason load is extreme only switching subs off helps us out of misery, or the website is offline. RJ and Russ are in the pub with Rob from Musicbrainz, so until tomorrow morning we can do nothing to improve the situation. sit tight. [b]UPDATE (Russ):[/b] PHP is being annoying yet again. Submissions are down until further notice. Sorry. [b]UPDATE (Russ - 2004-12-01 16:00 GMT):[/b] We're rewriting submissions in Java - it's going to be at least another 24 hours before we're up and running again, probably longer. [b]UPDATE (RJ - 3rd Dec):[/b] Running the php system whilst we finish the java rewrite. It's eating far more CPU that it should but we can get by until the java version is ready to deploy.[/quote]
Editado por RJ el 3 Dic 2004, 17:57

Vínculo permanente Citar
- Gravecat escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 15:35
I was wondering what all those weird 503 errors were about. Thanks for keeping us informed. :)

[quote][b][user]Gravecat[/user][/b] escribió: I was wondering what all those weird 503 errors were about. Thanks for keeping us informed. :)[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- id552 escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 15:51
When can we expect our charts to be updated? It's been quite a while.

Destroy the RIAA. An artist deserves more than £1 out of every 17.
Four years of torture and imprisonment without trial can never be justified.

[quote][b][user]id552[/user][/b] escribió: When can we expect our charts to be updated? It's been quite a while.[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- 7- escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 15:58
This was posted at 15:14 and it's 15:58 now. patience, small children.

i was responding to the person above, this is why i were telling people to be patient. lawks!

(H)

[quote][b][user]7-[/user][/b] escribió: This was posted at 15:14 and it's 15:58 now. patience, small children. i was responding to the person above, this is why i were telling people to be patient. lawks![/quote]
Editado por 7- el 30 Nov 2004, 17:59

Vínculo permanente Citar
- MySuperLove escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 15:59
Will the tracks we listen to in the downtime be added to our personal charts later?

[quote][b][user]MySuperLove[/user][/b] escribió: Will the tracks we listen to in the downtime be added to our personal charts later?[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- molarbear escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 16:00
thanks for the update :)

The Cat Game!

Scrobblermarried to +shanelavalette

[quote][b][user]molarbear[/user][/b] escribió: thanks for the update :)[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- RNR escribió...
- Personal de Last.fm
- 30 Nov 2004, 16:00
Re:

Quoth 7-:
This was posted at 15:14 and it's 15:58 now. patience, small children.
did i not say couple of hours? ;-)

Both kinds of music: Rock & Roll - SFTRI

[quote][b][user]RNR[/user][/b] escribió: [quote][b]Quoth 7-[/b]: This was posted at 15:14 and it's 15:58 now. patience, small children.[/quote] did i not say couple of hours? ;-) [/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- fraba escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 16:42
You did!
Did I complain? ;-)

Take your time...

[quote][b][user]fraba[/user][/b] escribió: You did! Did I complain? ;-) Take your time...[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- The_Trimp escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 16:47
there's got to be time for a pint of guinness, that's for sure
so let's all have one and wait for tomorrow :o)

[quote][b][user]The_Trimp[/user][/b] escribió: there's got to be time for a pint of guinness, that's for sure so let's all have one and wait for tomorrow :o)[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- aenariel escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 16:51
Re:

Quoth MySuperLove:
Will the tracks we listen to in the downtime be added to our personal charts later?

yes they will. :)

/aeni

[quote][b][user]aenariel[/user][/b] escribió: [quote][b]Quoth MySuperLove[/b]: Will the tracks we listen to in the downtime be added to our personal charts later?[/quote] yes they will. :) [/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- glazzycopter escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 17:14
Re:

Quoth MySuperLove:
Will the tracks we listen to in the downtime be added to our personal charts later?

you should know that by now...

[quote][b][user]glazzycopter[/user][/b] escribió: [quote][b]Quoth MySuperLove[/b]: Will the tracks we listen to in the downtime be added to our personal charts later?[/quote] you should know that by now... [/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- jimuk escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 17:22
Re: Re:

Quoth glazzycopter:
Quoth MySuperLove:
Will the tracks we listen to in the downtime be added to our personal charts later?

you should know that by now...

In my case, I don't think I will.

After playing Let It Bleed (Rolling Stones) a few hours ago, for the last 20 or so tracks I've been getting this meesage at the top of my main screen:

"Your plugin reported a submission error: Spam protection triggered (2004/11/30 16:22:06) dated earlier than previous submission (2004/11/30 16:22:21) (at 13:28:56 ART, Tuesday, November 30, 2004)"

This is complete rubbish as my computer clock has been fine, I can only think a server has time problems somewhere?

[quote][b][user]jimuk[/user][/b] escribió: [quote][b]Quoth glazzycopter[/b]: [quote][b]Quoth MySuperLove[/b]: Will the tracks we listen to in the downtime be added to our personal charts later?[/quote] you should know that by now... [/quote] In my case, I don't think I will. After playing Let It Bleed (Rolling Stones) a few hours ago, for the last 20 or so tracks I've been getting this meesage at the top of my main screen: "Your plugin reported a submission error: Spam protection triggered (2004/11/30 16:22:06) dated earlier than previous submission (2004/11/30 16:22:21) (at 13:28:56 ART, Tuesday, November 30, 2004)" This is complete rubbish as my computer clock has been fine, I can only think a server has time problems somewhere?[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- 7- escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 17:38
yeah you said a couple of hours, that's what i was pointing out. to the person above me. oh me oh my.

(H)

[quote][b][user]7-[/user][/b] escribió: yeah you said a couple of hours, that's what i was pointing out. to the person above me. oh me oh my.[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- mdragon escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 18:37
Re: Re: Re:

In my case, I don't think I will.

That's a plugin bug, has nothing to do with your clock or the server's clock. And yes your tracks will show up later assuming your plugin cache's correctly and doesn't trigger the spam protection.

[quote][b][user]mdragon[/user][/b] escribió: [quote] In my case, I don't think I will. [/quote] That's a plugin bug, has nothing to do with your clock or the server's clock. And yes your tracks will show up later assuming your plugin cache's correctly and doesn't trigger the spam protection.[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- glazzycopter escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 18:47
Re: Re: Re:

Quoth jimuk:
Quoth glazzycopter:
Quoth MySuperLove:
Will the tracks we listen to in the downtime be added to our personal charts later?

you should know that by now...

In my case, I don't think I will.

After playing Let It Bleed (Rolling Stones) a few hours ago, for the last 20 or so tracks I've been getting this meesage at the top of my main screen:

"Your plugin reported a submission error: Spam protection triggered (2004/11/30 16:22:06) dated earlier than previous submission (2004/11/30 16:22:21) (at 13:28:56 ART, Tuesday, November 30, 2004)"

This is complete rubbish as my computer clock has been fine, I can only think a server has time problems somewhere?

go to your settings, press save details without changing anything, it will magically go!!

[quote][b][user]glazzycopter[/user][/b] escribió: [quote][b]Quoth jimuk[/b]: [quote][b]Quoth glazzycopter[/b]: [quote][b]Quoth MySuperLove[/b]: Will the tracks we listen to in the downtime be added to our personal charts later?[/quote] you should know that by now... [/quote] In my case, I don't think I will. After playing Let It Bleed (Rolling Stones) a few hours ago, for the last 20 or so tracks I've been getting this meesage at the top of my main screen: "Your plugin reported a submission error: Spam protection triggered (2004/11/30 16:22:06) dated earlier than previous submission (2004/11/30 16:22:21) (at 13:28:56 ART, Tuesday, November 30, 2004)" This is complete rubbish as my computer clock has been fine, I can only think a server has time problems somewhere?[/quote] go to your settings, press save details without changing anything, it will magically go!![/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- Phlos escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 19:24
My charts are pretty weird. I got two number 6s and five number 12s and things like that. I don't really mind, I can wait (and you probably know this already), but it seems to me that your 'personal charts generating' scripts are a little ****ed up.

[quote][b][user]Phlos[/user][/b] escribió: My charts are pretty weird. I got two number 6s and five number 12s and things like that. I don't really mind, I can wait (and you probably know this already), but it seems to me that your 'personal charts generating' scripts are a little ****ed up.[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- Excalibre escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 21:13
Re:

Quoth Phlos:
My charts are pretty weird. I got two number 6s and five number 12s and things like that. I don't really mind, I can wait (and you probably know this already), but it seems to me that your 'personal charts generating' scripts are a little ****ed up.
Yes, there have been many, many posts on this. Not that this is the right place to bring it up anyway. Perhaps you could take some time to read any of the other threads on the subject before complaining. Note that the equally-ranked artists are the ones tied for that spot, and it's a known bug.

[quote][b][user]Excalibre[/user][/b] escribió: [quote][b]Quoth Phlos[/b]: My charts are pretty weird. I got two number 6s and five number 12s and things like that. I don't really mind, I can wait (and you probably know this already), but it seems to me that your 'personal charts generating' scripts are a little ****ed up.[/quote] Yes, there have been many, many posts on this. Not that this is the right place to bring it up anyway. Perhaps you could take some time to read any of the other threads on the subject before complaining. Note that the equally-ranked artists are the ones tied for that spot, and it's a known bug.[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- evilangela escribió...
- Usuario
- 30 Nov 2004, 23:01
Re: Re:

Quoth Excalibre:
Quoth Phlos:
My charts are pretty weird. I got two number 6s and five number 12s and things like that. I don't really mind, I can wait (and you probably know this already), but it seems to me that your 'personal charts generating' scripts are a little ****ed up.
Yes, there have been many, many posts on this. Not that this is the right place to bring it up anyway. Perhaps you could take some time to read any of the other threads on the subject before complaining. Note that the equally-ranked artists are the ones tied for that spot, and it's a known bug.

Given that there was a recent change to the numbering, resulting in the numbering using normal 'tied' methods (if there are 2 tied for #2, then the next after those is numbered 4, instead of 3 like it was before), I'm wondering if it really is a bug now or a feature? After all, why change the numbering to be more 'correct' if it's not supposed to be doing it at all?

I hope it's a feature, as I think it makes more sense to properly list tied artists as tied for the same position then to arbitrarity give some higher rankings.

Social music web sites compared (hint: Last.fm wins!)

[quote][b][user]evilangela[/user][/b] escribió: [quote][b]Quoth Excalibre[/b]: [quote][b]Quoth Phlos[/b]: My charts are pretty weird. I got two number 6s and five number 12s and things like that. I don't really mind, I can wait (and you probably know this already), but it seems to me that your 'personal charts generating' scripts are a little ****ed up.[/quote] Yes, there have been many, many posts on this. Not that this is the right place to bring it up anyway. Perhaps you could take some time to read any of the other threads on the subject before complaining. Note that the equally-ranked artists are the ones tied for that spot, and it's a known bug.[/quote] Given that there was a recent change to the numbering, resulting in the numbering using normal 'tied' methods (if there are 2 tied for #2, then the next after those is numbered 4, instead of 3 like it was before), I'm wondering if it really is a bug now or a feature? After all, why change the numbering to be more 'correct' if it's not supposed to be doing it at all? I hope it's a feature, as I think it makes more sense to properly list tied artists as tied for the same position then to arbitrarity give some higher rankings.[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- starcat escribió...
- Suscriptor
- 30 Nov 2004, 23:04
When my profile updated yesterday, the bug was fixed. Two #14s, no #15. Four #43s, the next number being 47. This also was the case for my songs: a whole bunch of 3s, then a whole bunch of 9s, then 19s, etc.
Since I don't think it has been fixed just for me, I think you just have to wait for an update.

[quote][b][user]starcat[/user][/b] escribió: When my profile updated yesterday, the bug was fixed. Two #14s, no #15. Four #43s, the next number being 47. This also was the case for my songs: a whole bunch of 3s, then a whole bunch of 9s, then 19s, etc. Since I don't think it has been fixed just for me, I think you just have to wait for an update.[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- aradnuk escribió...
- Suscriptor
- 30 Nov 2004, 23:08
*tempting fate*

we good again? 503s and 505s or whatever they were vanquished?

make so many charts your head might explode

[quote][b][user]aradnuk[/user][/b] escribió: *tempting fate* we good again? 503s and 505s or whatever they were vanquished?[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- herman78 escribió...
- Suscriptor
- 30 Nov 2004, 23:17
have fun in the pub! don't drink too much, it's only tuesday. ;)

[quote][b][user]herman78[/user][/b] escribió: have fun in the pub! don't drink too much, it's only tuesday. ;)[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- Russ escribió...
- Suscriptor
- 30 Nov 2004, 23:26
I just switched them back on, tentatively. We shall see.

[quote][b][user]Russ[/user][/b] escribió: I just switched them back on, tentatively. We shall see.[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- sporkguy escribió...
- Usuario
- 1 Dic 2004, 0:03
Still getting 'failed' here - havnt managed to get a first list up yet :(

[quote][b][user]sporkguy[/user][/b] escribió: Still getting 'failed' here - havnt managed to get a first list up yet :([/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- escribió...
- Usuario
- 1 Dic 2004, 0:06
Hate to be a 'me too' but... me too. >_<

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] escribió: Hate to be a 'me too' but... me too. >_<[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar
- ImiLeathr escribió...
- Usuario
- 1 Dic 2004, 0:09
My tracks played just jumped forward a lot, but my Recent Tracks is exactly the same.

Ah well, at least there's some signs of movement.

[quote][b][user]ImiLeathr[/user][/b] escribió: My tracks played just jumped forward a lot, but my Recent Tracks is exactly the same. Ah well, at least there's some signs of movement.[/quote]

Vínculo permanente Citar